Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
Employing internal based resources gives a better competitive edge to an organisation as those resources are already in place. This eliminates extra cost of getting new funding or resources as in option A.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
The profit motive
Explanation:
Although the <em>profit motive</em> is essential and common among all businesses that exist, it is by nature anti-competitive, meaning it is not a trait used to create substantial competitive advantage. It is a notion that will certainly not attract customers. However, it is always present (and most customers know that), but the profit motive will never be communicated through mrketing activities etc.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": unfavorably; increases.
Explanation:
As a measure to control inflation in the economy, the Federal Reserve (Fed) tends to <em>increase </em>the interest rate. This to have banks request fewer loans from the central bank which will result in offering fewer credits to individuals. If people have fewer sources of debt, the possibilities that an economic bubble -<em>continuous increase in price due to continuous increase in demand</em>- appear decreases.
However, if people have fewer sources of debt, private investment decreases, causing an <em>unfavorable </em>panorama for financial institutions offering large portfolios of assets.
