1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leya [2.2K]
3 years ago
9

When the wheels of a bicycle rotate 30 times the bicycle moves a distance of 175 feet what is the rate

Mathematics
1 answer:
LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: 5 5/6 feet per rotation

Step-by-step explanation:

d/t=175/30=5 5/6

You might be interested in
Is 3/8 greater that 1/2
belka [17]

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jim earns $1,600 per month after taxes. He is working on his budget and has the first three categories finished. Why will he hav
marissa [1.9K]
What are the answers?
8 0
3 years ago
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
If vertex U is located at (-4, 5) and vertex V is located at (-6, 2), then vertex U′ is located at
elixir [45]

The vertex U' is located at (-4, -5)

<h3>How to determine the location of U'?</h3>

The vertices are given as:

U = (-4, 5)

V = (-6, 2)

The rule of transformation is given as:

Reflection across the x-axis

This is represented as:

(x, y) => (x, -y)

So, we have:

U' = (-4, -5)

Hence, the vertex U' is located at (-4, -5)

Read more about transformation at:

brainly.com/question/11707700

#SPJ1

<u>Complete question</u>

Quadrilateral UVWX is reflected over the x-axis to form quadrilateral U′V′W′X′. If vertex U is located at (-4, 5) and vertex V is located at (-6, 2), then vertex U′ is located at

7 0
2 years ago
To be honest this is a dud question just answer for points and if multiple people answer I will give one of them brainliest.
MArishka [77]

Answer:

If you live to be 70, you will have spent 10 years of your life on Monday.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write an equivalent expression using the given property.
    12·1 answer
  • It takes Johnny 42 minutes to get to the zoo after 18 minutes he stopped to get gas for his car what writing equation to express
    6·2 answers
  • Please help this is my last question
    6·1 answer
  • This coordinate grid shows where Alberto's school is located. Each unit represents one block. Alberto's house is at (3,4). The l
    5·2 answers
  • Find the slope of the line that passes through (3,7) and (5,4)
    15·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE 100 POINTS
    5·2 answers
  • 15. Circle all of the expressions equivalent to 9x - y.
    6·1 answer
  • A hiker is standing on the ground looking up to the top of a tree with an angle of elevation of °= 55 The situation represented
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following is an example of acceleration? A. 10m/s B. 64km/h/min C. 50 cm2/s2 D. 46 km/h​
    10·1 answer
  • STep right up for a brainliest challenge
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!