Answer: Legal- rational Leadership style
Explanation:
The rational-legal style also known as transactional leadership is when a leader exercises control and authority on the basis of his knowledge to his subordinates.
Transactional leader is someone who values order and structure based on rules and regulations to complete task on time. Transactional leaders do not encourage personal creativity and innovative ideas because They depend on people who work well in a structured, directed environment ruled by influence and control.
Their main focus is on RESULTS, conformity to the existing structure of an organization and measures success based on the organization’s system of rewards and penalties. This type of leader is responsible for maintaining routine by managing and monitoring individual and group performance.
This type of leader sets the criteria for their workers according to existing defined requirements. Performance reviews are the most common way to judge employee performance.
Transactional leaders differ from other leaders like the charismatic and transformational leaders in that it is only results oriented.
In a nut shell, the legal rational Leadership style focuses on the give and take style based on controlling the performance of the individual and determining how well he or she can deliver in a structured environment.
We can then infer that the boss follows the legal-rational leadership style.
The answer is "operant conditoning".
Operant conditioning is a technique for discovering that happens through prizes and disciplines for conduct. Through operant conditioning , an individual makes a relationship between a specific conduct and an outcome.
Operant conditioning depends on a genuinely basic preface - activities that are trailed by fortification will be reinforced and more inclined to happen again later on. In the event that you recount an entertaining story in class and everyone snickers, you will presumably probably recount that story again later on.
Boston Massacre forced the French to give up their claim in Canada and Spain was forced to give up Florida.
Answer:
No, a single party's presence and its ideology's popularity do not ensure adequate contestation.
