Answer:
C - The consequences could cause loss of privileges.
It is false that the Taylor’s 3 stores of atrocities reveal that it is not the intentions behind them, but what really count are the dreadful consequences of these acts. In actuality, it is the opposite of this statement that is true, therefore, what really counts are the intentions behind the acts.
It's true the slaughterhouse cases are an example of the supreme court whittling away at the freedoms gained by the blacks during reconstruction.
Option A) is true.
The Supreme Court decision in the 1873 Slaughterhouse Case was a setback for African Americans. Because the court held that the most basic civil rights of Americans were acquired through state citizenship, and the Amendment did not protect those rights. legislation.
The Slaughterhouse Cases, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1873, limited the "privileges and immunities" of citizens protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to states to those provided for in the Constitution. and many held that they did not involve individuals. State Rights.
Learn more about slaughterhouse case at
brainly.com/question/9354360
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>reasonable suspicion
</span><span>Investigation under reasonable suspicion would give negative backlash if proven to be abused by the officers, but it still give them legal stand point to conduct a search on private properties.
Officers need to find things such as blood evidence, screams, or gun shots to conduct searches under reasonable suspicion.</span>
