The correct answer is <em>A), a lack of education will not make women care only about household issues.
</em>
English writer <em>Mary Wollstonecraft(1759-1797)</em>, was considered one of the first feminist as she always supported women's equality. She wrote a famous book on the topic called <em>“Vindication of the Rights of Woman”</em>, which made her a woman’s rights activist.
The concepts in her book created controversy because they were revolutionary for those years. For instance, in her book <em>“Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman”,</em> she declares that women had strong sexual desires and those desires not need to be suppressed.
Answer:
<em>Well, Your best answer will be is </em><em>A. Making spending decisions in the national interest. Good Luck!</em>
Depression ist the best answer, due to the "Great Depression" during the 1920's that stipulated your conditions
This question is incomplete, here's the complete question.
See attached venn diagram.
How many women at the party are under 30?
How many men at the party are not under 30?
How many women are at the party? How many people are at the party?
Answer:
- 16 women under 30
- 22 men not under 30
- 44 women at the party
- 81 people at the party
Explanation:
A Venn diagram has overlapping circles, each one containing all the components of a group. Where the circles
The overlap reveals the elements that different groups have in common.
Total of people at the party:
22 men not under 30
+
15 men under 30
+
16 women under 30
+
28 not men, nor under 30
Total = 81 people at the party
If there are 22 men not under 30, and 15 men under 30, it means there´re 37 men and 44 women at the party.
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
