Answer:
Cash flow to creditors in 2018 is −$85,000
Explanation:
2017 balance sheet of Kerber’s Tennis Shop, Inc is recorded as
Interest paid............................................................................$255,000
Less:
long-term debt in 2018.........................................................$2.21 million
Less: long-term debt brought forward from 2017..........$1.87 million
Total (taken as net new borrowing)...................................$340,000
Cash flow to creditors = 2018 Interest expense less net new borrowing
= $255,000 - $340,000
= −$85,000
Answer:a. Total common stock issued is 750 millions
b. In treasury is 109 million
c. Outstanding 750 million.
Explanation:
Issued shares referred to the total amount of authorised shares that has been issued to the public for subscription.
Treasury stock refers to parts of the issued stock that are held up for the ownership of the issuing company.
Outstanding stock refers to the total number of stock issued and fully paid for from the issued stock.
Answer:
Objectives of HRM include ensuring availability of resources, easy access to data, on-time payroll, ensuring compliances, etc. HRM objectives are basically influenced by organisational goals and vertical. Objective of HRM is to ensure a stable work environment with data at one place and efficient operations.
This is the situation of countries like Germany,
Where exports > imports...
The results is definitely good for the country. It will increase its trade surplus. This allow the country to amassed a huge number of foreign reserves which they can use to invest abroad..
While countries that import > exports, will experienced trade loss/deficit (just think it like the reverse)
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
