This Question Is one I can not answer. The question is what would YOU do, not me. But Think about this: What kind of position did the soldiers have? Where they attacking? Defending? Losing? Winning? what must have been going on in there heads? Try putting yourself in that position. If you need to, go in the lesson and find out more about the riots on czar.
Answer:
Napoleon Bonaparte had no social expression and was not admired by the French.
Explanation:
Supported by the bourgeoisie, politicians and the army, Napoleon was responsible for delivering the 18 Brumaire coup, after which established his leadership and secured the bourgeoisie in power. Bonaparte was also seen as the savior in his homeland of France. Napoleon Bonaparte contrary to believe was admired in his homeland of France. he as also faced strong opposition from Jacobins and monarchists who at that time didn’t believe in his philosophy.
Answer:
Democracy was not in unity, but the national independence of each state as a separate nation unto itself, which vested in the supreme power of the voters in each state having final Authority over it, while government was simply the hired help.
Lincoln had already threatened in 1856, that he would oppose secession with military force; and that's why the GOP lobbyists chose him to be president in 1860.
And why the South seceded in response.
The only way to save democracy, was to assert the historical fact that each state was a democratic Nation, and that any attempt by the federal government to invade any state, would be an act of Rogue imperialism.
However ever since Jackson's original nullification Proclamation, nobody officially countered this claim, and therefore it was able to corrupt official history for 28 years until Lincoln came to power.
Hope this helped! :)
Answer:
c I think not for sure sorry if it wrong
Explanation:
