1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
choli [55]
3 years ago
7

PLEASE HELP QUICK!!!

History
2 answers:
Firdavs [7]3 years ago
8 0
A Italy fought on the losing side during world war ll.
Snowcat [4.5K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
What were the goals of the new deal
Tasya [4]
Provide relief, recovery, and reform.

Answer: D
7 0
3 years ago
1. Why were Anglo settlers in Texas dissatisfied with Mexican rule?
Otrada [13]

Answer:

iyo7

Explanation:

tyik76rol68r

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the 32 president of the u.s.a.?
Snowcat [4.5K]
Franklin D. Roosevelt
You're Welcome!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When Washington became president, New York City was the capital.<br> What happened to change that?
lara [203]

Answer:

Hamilton agreed to support a plan to move the capital to the South to gain support for his financial plan.

6 0
3 years ago
In which ways was the ottoman and society tolerant and in What Ways Was it not?
skad [1K]

It depends on what you understand from tolerance. It is true that the Ottoman administration usually did not care about ethno-religious groups’ internal affairs, and left them alone to a large extent. Nevertheless, non-Muslims were second-class citizens. Heterodox Muslims, such as the Alevis, the Druze and Alawites, were collectively considered to be heretics and they were not recognised as a group of people, and thus were deprived of any rights. Sometimes this utter intolerance toward ‘heretic’ Muslim groups extended to include many Sufi branches of Islam (especially during Kadizadeliler’s reign of terror) many of which would be considered mainstream by many Turks today,


Although the Millet system is celebrated for being tolerant, it caused these groups to have isolated modi vivendi. Armenians, Jews, Greeks and and Muslims had separate quarters, separate schools, separate legal systems and separate ethnarchs (like the Chief Rabbi or the Greek Orthodox Patriarch). This social and legal division prevented the Empire to assert a sense of “Ottoman Citizenship” in the late 19th century, and many millets wanted to have a separate country of their own. This resulted in many wars in the Balkans in late 19th and early 20th centuries, and of an Armenian sepaor the U.S.


ratist revolt supported by Russia in 1915 which the nationalist junta at the time (the C.U.P) used as a pretext for starting the Armenian genocide.


Today, Turkey is religiously very homogenous as non-Muslim minorities were driven out throughout the decades following the commencement of WWI.


So, “tolerance” was not always there (we’re talking about a 600 year-old empire, mind you) and it didn’t resemble modern open societies like Canada or the U.S.


i hope this helped bc it sure did take a while. lol

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the Louisiana Purchase treaty an important document in the study of Manifest Destiny?
    11·1 answer
  • Industrialization encouraged empire building because
    15·1 answer
  • How and when did th Europeans Learn about chocolate?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Carnegie do to ensure that his money would be used to help society?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was it important for the US to gain Texas
    12·1 answer
  • Would history be different if Britain never passed the quartering act? Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
  • What does this cartoon describe in World War 1?
    12·2 answers
  • How did these inventions affect the number of farmers needed to to grow food?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the primary focus of US national security policy?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statements describe domestic policy
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!