Answer:
C
Explanation:
First I'm gonna assume that these are the answer choices
A. he served only two terms
B. he established dignity in office
C. he lived in the White House
D. he formed the cabinet
He argued that in the form presented to him it was incompatible with "justice", "sound policy" and the constitution
Correct answer choice is :
B) Gothic
Explanation:
Gothic architecture is a structural technique that thrived in Europe throughout the High and Late Middle Ages. It emerged from Romanesque construction and was displaced by Renaissance architecture. Starting in 12th-century France and lasting into the 16th century, Gothic architecture was identified during the time as opus Francine with the title Gothic first appearing during the recent part of the Renaissance.
<span>I can't say I know much about the history of Buddhism, but I think I know something about the practice itself. Christianity is a religion of action - a religion that speaks out and acts out. It's a religion that goes to war and asserts itself to gain followers and prove points. From what I understand about Buddhism, it is a 'passive' religion. It is a system of belief that stands on meditation and response rather than reaction. I haven't really heard of any Buddhist groups starting wars, fighting in battles, and singing in victory. Their triumph comes in quiet ways whereas it seems that Christianity triumphed in loud and obvious ways.</span>
Answer
Appeal to a higher federal court.
Explanation
The trial process. Listen. At the trial, the accused may be tried by judge alone or by judge and jury. The purpose of the trial is to present all relevant admissible evidence to the court. The jury will decide the guilt or innocence of the accused person. In the trial courts, the lawyers present evidence and legal arguments to persuade the jury in a jury trial or the judge in a bench trial. After the party loses in the trial court or it is not contented with the ruling one can appeal to the Us supreme court. The appellant or the party who files an appeal must show that the trial court made a legal error that affected the decision in the case.The appellant prepares a written document, or brief, discussing the legal arguments. In this process, appellants cite previous court cases that support their point of view.
