Answer: Sabric is correct because 3.613 is smaller than 3.63. Therefore, –3.613 lies to the left of –3.63 on a number line.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Sabric's claim = –3.613 > –3.63
Jessica's claim = –3.613 < –3.63
From the claims above, - 3.613 is greater than - 3.63, this is because both numbers are negative and as such moving towards the left hand side of the number line from 0. - 3.613 will be encountered first before - 3.630, which signifies that - 3.613 is greater than - 3.630
Answer:
It graph A I'm here to help not give the wrong answer.Trust me ik how it feels
Answer:
6: Reason 2 - substitution, Statement 4 - PR congruent to PR, Reason 4 - reflexive property, Reason 5 - AAS
8: Rotation
Step-by-step explanation:
6: Since both of the given angles equal 90°, you can <em>substitute</em> Angle RPT in to make Angle PRQ congruent to Angle RPT. Then, since both triangles share Line PR, <em>PR would be congruent to PR</em> by the <em>reflexive property</em>. And since you know that Angle Q is congruent to Angle T, you can see that Triangle QRP is congruent to Triangle TPR by the <em>AAS theorem</em>.
8: Since the 1st triangle is pointing to the right and the 2nd triangle is pointing downward, this would be a rotation of 90° clockwise (or 90° counterclockwise if the 1st triangle is the one pointing downward)
I don't have 7, sorry.
Also (if you haven't noticed it already), there's a typo in the 1st statement of the proof. Just thought I'd let you know ;)
