<span>it combines the benefits of a partnership and a corporation.</span>
Answer:
Producer surplus
Neither
Consumer surplus
Explanation:
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of the good and the least price the seller is willing to sell his product.
1. Price = $149
least price seller was willing to sell his laptop = $140.
Hence it's producer surplus.
2. Price = $59
there's no information on the least price the seller was willing to sell or the highest amount the buyer was willing to buy.
hence it's neither producer or consumer surplus
3. Price = $39
highest amount buyer was willing to buy = $46
Hence, it's consumer surplus
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: The correct answer is "D. They earn identical rewards per unit of systematic risk.".
Explanation: If you are comparing 3 values and by calculating, find that they all have the same Treynor ratio means that they earn identical rewards per unit of systematic risk.
Answer:
1) 19.23/Positive
2) Normal
Explanation:
In order to calculate the income elasticity of a product we will have to measure the percentage change in income and the percentage change in quantity purchased of that product cause by the change of income.
Percentage change income = (83,000-77,000)/77,000= 7.8%
Income increased by 7.8%.
Percentage change in purchase of movie downloads= (55-22)/22= 150%
So a 7.8% increase in income increases the purchases by 150%, in order to calculate the income elasticity we will divide 150 by 7.8
150/7.8=19.23
Income elasticity = 19.23
Because the income elasticity is positive we can infer that movie downloads are normal goods because the quantity purchased increases when income increases.
Answer:
B) losses you avoided by not buying a stock that has since decreased in price
Explanation:
If a stock has not been bought, there has not been a transaction involving that particular stock. Even though, in theory, you may have avoided losses by not buying a stock that has decreased in price, there hasn't been any actual gain or loss on investment related to that stock since there was no investment.
Since all other alternatives present valid parameters when calculating return on investment, the answer is B).
