Neutrality
Policy of supporting neither side in a war.
Hope this helps
Yeah your answer is A as you can see by the picture ^^
lol
The Court's ruling effectively freed corporations and unions to spend money both on "electioneering communications" and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates (although not to contribute directly to candidates or political parties).
Answer:
From undermining war effort or speaking bad against the government
Explanation:
The espionage act of 1917 and the Sedition act of 1918, made every disloyal or abusive language against the u items states military and government a criminal offense.
The president was afraid that a ti war speeches would undermine the efforts they were putting in at the war. The act also targeted socialists, anarchists, pacifists. Any one who violated could spend up to 29byears in prison and fine 10000 dollars
False, they did fire but it was not the intention of the soldiers.
