I discovered that a key moment in Roman history was a very little-discussed raid by pirates on the Port of Rome at Ostia.
Rome was at that point the dominant world superpower, and there was no state in the world that would ever have dared to attack Rome. But the Romans were attacked by a group of stateless desperados who set fire to the Port. The flames may well have been visible in Rome itself. And this sent a shockwave through Rome, because if pirates could strike that close to the imperial capital, nowhere was safe.
And in this panicky atmosphere - an atmosphere of panic, I might say, which was deliberately whipped up by ambitious politicians - the Roman people took a series of fatal steps, surrendering some of their liberties and some of their control over their government. And in doing so, they sewed the seeds of the destruction of their own democracy.
And the more I looked at that event, the more it seemed familiar to me and the parallel with 9/11 - and in particular the response to it.
They became settlers
Pls mark brainliest remember our deal.
Answer:
B.Theodore Roosevelt
Explanation:
Theodore Roosevelt was American politician who served as 26th president of the US. He stayed in office from 1901 to 1909. He also worked as 25th vice president of USA. He is considered to be among five best presidents. Construction of [panama canal was completed during his presidency, he used Big Stick Diplomacy and brokered to get agreement for constructing Panama canal. He also expanded US influence in Cuba and negotiated the peace treaty between Russia and Japan.
People give different versions of the same story as they want. The Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account is important as His first-hand account contradicts the denial.
The Ottoman government in 1916 was known to have massacres a lot of people.
The Armenian genocide denial was a big case in the world. The claim made by the Ottoman Empire and the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) was that they had no hand in the genocide against the Armenian people during World War I.
This was a very big crime that has a lot of documentation on the numbers of evidences to prove their guilt but they still won't accept that they committed it.
See full question below
Considering that the Ottoman government denied any orders or mass killings, why is Turkish Army Officer Lieutenant Baas' account important?
A. His first-hand account supports the Ottoman government
B. His first-hand account contradicts this denial
C. He had recovered old documents that support the Ottoman government
D. He had recovered old documents that contradict this denial
Learn more about Ottoman government from
brainly.com/question/25798424
