Answer:
British Soldiers
Explanation:
because none of that would have happened if the did taxes the colonist items
Answer:
In this example Hector is the appellant
Explanation:
An appellant is a person who is not happy or satisfied with the decision of a lower court and hence he/she appeals to the higher court for looking into the decision taken by the lower court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court.
Since, Hector is also appealing to the higher court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court, he will be known as an appellant
The analysis of this letter that this Chinese wrote is that they were being asked to contribute towards building something they were not receiving.
<h3>The summary of the letter</h3>
The summary of this letter is that Saum was exposing the hypocrisy of a government that wanted them to contribute towards building the statue of liberty yet the same government was rejecting Chinese immigrants.
He pointed out how unfair the nation was towards Chinese people and how they are restricted from enjoying the liberty that is promised in America.
Read more on the statue of liberty here:
brainly.com/question/1533987
