The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the choices of the questions. Without the choices, we do not have references. However, hope we can help with the following comments.
Jus ad bellum is the kind of legislation that authorizes the transition from a state of peace and agreement to a state of war, where the use of the armed forces is justified. It implies that just a legitimate authority can wage war when no other option is left. Just ad bellum have some principles, that include: right authority, right intention, proportionality, reasonable hope, and last intention, which can be understood as the case in which war is the last resource after a long period of diplomacy and negotiation, under the right authority and the valid reasons to proceed as the last resource to solve an issue.
Answer: it looks like people are at someone funral
Explanation:
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice.
To punish the city of Boston for its infamous Tea Party, Parliament passed the Intolerable Acts.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
The Constitution says federal laws are "the supreme law of the land," so the federal government could just take complete control. Nothing in the Constitution says the federal government has power to limit peoples' freedoms in the first place. ... People won't know their leaders and will lose control over the government
Answer: A) the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court appointed by John Adams, who began a process called judicial review
