The correct answer is: "Plessy v. Ferguson"
Plessy vs Ferguson was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896, which legimitized the existence of segregated public education facilities as long as these were equal in quality. It actually introduced the principle of "separate but equal".
In the Plessy v. Ferguson the justices had considered that, as long as equal quality was provided, segregation was not violating the Equal Protection Clause included in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. Therefore, segregation was not contrary to the US Constitution and therefore legitime. Fortunately, the Supreme Court in 1954, in the case of Brown v. Board of Education understood it differently, and dismantled segregation forever.
Answer:
the expansion
Explanation:
the expansion of credit in the 1920's allowed for the sale of more consumers.
The Brown vs Board of Education legal case was a very important part of history which essentially ended segregation among blacks and whites in schools and started to integrate them together.
Brown vs Board of Education started in the 1950's when a young African American girl had to walk over a mile to school everyday, but there was a school for whites very close by.
This was when the NAACP, which advocated for the rights and freedoms of colored people came in. They believed segregation among schools and "separate but equal" was in fact <em>not</em> equal.
Eventually, the Brown vs Board of Education case went to the Supreme Court, when finally in 1954 the case was won by the NAACP and integration between public schools began.
Many citizens and schools were against integration and many more rulings with the Supreme Court had to occur, but finally a few decades later all of the public schools in the United States were integrated among races and the "separate but equal" principle was no longer.
Answer:
A) One specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can now run for public office. This connects to how the author describes how women are just as capable and valuable as men.
B) Another specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text is that women can get a post-secondary education now.
C) One specific example of how a continuity in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present counters an argument made in the text is that women are still struggling to get paid a wage that is equal to that of a man. This counters the argument that these movement would be able to change all the woes women face.
Explanation:
