1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zolol [24]
3 years ago
6

Look at the enormous limestone statue below. Known as the Great Sphinx of Giza, it was created in about 2500 BCE in Egypt. What

conclusion can you reasonably draw from this artifact?


 A.Egyptian civilization in 2500 BCE was the most advanced in the world. B.Stone carving was the most valued skill a person could have in early Egypt. C.People living in early Egypt valued technology more than religion. D.Early Egyptians were capable of carving complex figures in stone.
History
1 answer:
ira [324]3 years ago
3 0


A is incorrect, you cannot come to such a conclusion by looking at a picture of a Sphinx

B is incorrect, you'd need far more information to assume that stone carving was the MOST valued skill in early Egypt

C is incorrect, a picture of a Sphinx tells us very little about  whether the Egyptians valued technology over religion.


Just by looking at the Sphinx, one can infer that the ancient Egyptians were capable of carving couple figures in stone. They DID make the Sphinx, after all.

Answer=D
You might be interested in
Can someone please explain McCulloch vs Maryland to me? I read the article about it over and over but I just don't seem to fully
zheka24 [161]
It's kinda hard to explain but I found a reliable website
http://www.history.com/topics/mcculloch-v-maryland
6 0
3 years ago
Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.
sammy [17]

Answer:

In modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflictogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
This is due in exactly 10 minutes I need help asap please.
sweet [91]

Answer:

The U.S had many motives to have intervene in the war. The united states was correct in intervening in the Korean war because they feared if a nation falled to communism then other nearby nations might do the same. Tensions regarding communism were at an all time high and not intervening in the fight agaisnt communism might have looked bad and incited more fear.

Explanation:

i dk

3 0
2 years ago
How did senator Stephen Douglass propose the issue of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska be settled?
Lena [83]
He proposed the idea of popular soverenty, which means the people vote on issues that concern the state they live in.
6 0
3 years ago
Who were the Gestapo?
Bad White [126]

Explanation:

The Gestapo was the secret police

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Unlike Britain France and Russia the United States
    9·1 answer
  • ASAP!!
    8·1 answer
  • Why do people ask appellate courts to review their cases?
    10·2 answers
  • How are the powers divided between the state and Central explain with example​
    8·1 answer
  • Trenches were built during World War 1 for what reason
    10·1 answer
  • Who manages a corporation?
    5·2 answers
  • 10. George lives in a country with an economy where the government
    5·1 answer
  • What is the "true goal” of the New Deal?
    6·2 answers
  • Saving Water is a Cinch!
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Founding Fathers removed this paragraph fron
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!