<span>(a) Which large areas were united under one ruler? Give at least three examples
Three large areas that were united under one ruler are the Roman empire, The Alexander Magnus Empire, and the Mongolian Empire. Those three represents three empires in the history of humanity that united under one ruler huge areas, that extended between continents and different countries throughout the Earth.
(b) Which rulers of dynasties, governments, kings, or emperors united large areas under one rule? Give at least three examples.
As for the Roman Empire, it was Julio Cesar who united the brought the Empire at the peak of its power. In the case of Alexander Magnus, it was him that took the Macedonian and Greek power outsider their border governing a huge area of territories. As for the Mongolian Empire, the principal ruler and conqueror was Genghis Khan, which united the tribes and extended the influnce of its country to new reaches.
(c) What are some strategies or practices rulers have used to unify diverse people in their empires under one rule? Cite at least three strategies or practices and mention some rulers or governments that used each of those strategies.
The principal strategy in the Roman Empire was divide and conquer. They divided the enemy army into small pieces and then defeat each of them separately. Alexander Magnus used a strategy that trapped the enemy army inside a pincer. Genghis Khan often </span><span>resorted to inciting internal revolt among the enemy supporters.</span>
When the court renders an opinion, the Chief Justice- when in the majority-decides who writes the courts' opinion. So the answer is B
Legalized gaming has had a tremendous effect on Mississippi during the first decade of its existence.
<h3>
Why gaming is so important in Mississippi?</h3>
The modernization of US cities has caused a reduction in overall river pollution. The development of large farms has polluted the river through waste runoff.
The use of the river for shipping has stayed relatively the same since 1800. The decrease in fishing in the river has led to a shortage of seafood products.
Learn more about Mississippi, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/11734537
#SPJ1
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
1- customer service representative
2- office manager
3- executive assistant
