All categories

3 years ago

How does the relationship between executive and legislative branches of government address Madison's Dilemma?

Social Studies

1 answer:

DENIUS [597]3 years ago

5 0

The relationship between executive and legislative are based on origin and survival.

<u>Explanation:</u>

In Madison's address relation within the executive and legislative branches enjoy separation.
He explains about origin and survival of electing the executive members for the government.
In a parliamentary system no separation.
The members can select by legislators.
The main concept of the dilemma is power under Presidentialism.
In a particular place, checks and balances are made.
In a parliamentary system no checks and balances.
The legislative branch makes laws for the government.
According to Madison's legislative government is strongest.
Madison's dilemma is setting limited and effective government.

You might be interested in

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of

marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0

3 years ago

You have read "Jabberwocky" and listened to an audio recording of the poem. Compare and contrast what it was like to read the po

Lelechka [254]

Answer:

Reading and listening to the poem are similar because the words help me imagine what is being described. Listening to the poem is different than reading it because the reader's voice brings the poem to life and helps me better understand the nonsense words.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are animals used as subject in experiments

NeTakaya

Animals are used in experiments because they have somewhat similar structures as humans so they can gauge a human's reaction to something.

Also because the animals can't say no. :(

8 0

4 years ago

Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional

enyata [817]

Answer:

Smith rejects government interference in market activities, and instead states governments should serve just 3 functions: protect national borders; enforce civil law; and engage in public works.

Explanation:

I got it right, have a good day everyone

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Laura would like to shape the tidiness of her husband, who always leaves his clothes in a pile on the floor at the end of the da

aalyn [17]

Answer:Her plan is good and it seems to be effective especially as she is being consistent with it.

Explanation: she did it with him to put his laundry in the right place and he did,next it was with folding the laundry and he kept doing it .

Men appreciate being acknowledged for what they do so she is able to manipulate his mind by complimenting what he does whilst she is be benefiting by having to deal with

less laundry that is placed in the wrong place all over the house .

The compliments that goes with the actual reward makes the process and the effort worth it to do the right thing and it also encourages him to do more of what his wife asks for .

7 0

3 years ago