I believe that the answers are
less than and tend to
hope this helps and good luck and a wonderful day :)
Answer:
a) point estimate is 30%
b) null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. </em>
Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals
ie 30%
<em>b.</em>
Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
<em>c.</em>
z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
- p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
- N is the sample size (600)
then z=
= 1.655
Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.
Answer:
the answer is 2. AB, BC, and CA are the same
Answer:
then 2x = 0 and x - 3 = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y = -2x + 4
Step-by-step explanation:
First, find the slope by doing rise over run. I did this between the points (0, 4) and (2,0) This gives you -4/2 = -2.
Then, find the y-intercept, which is where the line goes through the y axis. This is at y = 4.
So, the equation is y = -2x + 4.