Answer:
a. Cherry-picking of evidence
Explanation:
Cherry-picking: The term "cherry-picking" is also referred to as "fallacy of incomplete evidence" or "suppressing evidence" is described as the specific act of pointing or denoting to individual data or cases that seem to withstand or confirm a specific position while avoiding an important part of similar and related data or cases that tends to contradict that particular position.
Example: Resumes.
In the question above, the given statement represents "cherry-picking of evidence" as the correct answer.
Answer:
Synthesis
Explanation:
A synthesis is combination of ideas, features or elements to a single outcome or whole.
Herman and Todd are discussing two ideas for the T-shirt selection logos.
If Herman were to fuse these ideas together, it means he will have to create a synthesis of these ideas to fit into the T-shirt logo choice.
Answer:
The expectations are called A. Roles.
Explanation:
A role refers to the <em>position an individual carries within society</em>, which comes with certain expectations. Since the individual carries a certain status with this role, there is a definition of what are <em>appropriate and inappropriate behaviors</em> regarding his/her position.
For example, a school principal has a high status and position within the school community. He/she is required to set a good example for the community so there are expectations regarding an appropriate behavior such as providing support to the staff, for example. An inappropriate behavior would be engaging in illicit acts, for example.
Answer:
In the United States, federal mandates are orders that induce "responsibility, action, procedure or anything else that is imposed by constitutional, administrative, executive, or judicial action" for state and local governments and/or the private sector.
Explanation:
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
It is not that the doctors are not competent ,they were sent by the government, the government can't send incompetent doctors to solve an epidemic ,but it is going to be ommited variables by the doctors on the sickness, yes it takes time to figure out the root of sickness, looking at the period of early 19th century, medical method might not have reached a convincing level ,so there is possibility of omitted variables, maybe there were not able to have much time to figure out the sickness that might caused the death. So option A is the best possible answer.
