Answer:
Similarities between the Know-Nothing Party and the Response to the Red Scare of 1919
1) Both called for equal rights for women and African Americans:
b. False
2) Both sought to limit immigration to the United States:
a. True
3) Both supported the overseas expansion of the United States:
b. False
4) Both attempted to limit the influence of big business on American politics:
b. False
Explanation:
The Know-Nothing Party in the 1850's was a clandestine nativist organization that later formed the American Party. This political party, according to britannica.com, "called for restrictions on immigration, the exclusion of the foreign-born from voting or holding public office in the United States, and for a 21-year residency requirement for citizenship."
On the other hand, the response to the Red Scare of 1919, the first Red Scare described the fear of communism and anarchism during the cold war between Russia and the United States. In the response to the Red Scare of 1919, there were calls for immigration restrictions and purging of the Russian Communist influence in the United States.
Conclusively, both sought to limit immigration to the United States.
Social Darwinism most heavily affected the US government's relationship to big business during the late 1800s, coined by Mark Twain as "the Gilded Age." The theory affected this relationship by convincing (or allowing politicians to convince themselves) that only the strongest will survive and thus the government operated under a <em>laissez-faire </em>system (French for "hands off"). The government felt it should not regulate or weigh in on business issues and instead let businesses conduct affairs amongst themselves; however, this led to the creation of large monopolies, the formation of a moneyed elite still with us today, and the creation of the now huge wealth gap between the richest and poorest Americans.
<span>A. It is a joint process of the executive branch and Congress.</span>
Feudalism was initially displayed after the Roman custom of support. Feudalism was a mix of legitimate and military traditions in medieval Europe that prospered between the ninth and fifteenth hundreds of years. Extensively characterized, it was a method for organizing society around connections gotten from the holding of land in return for administration or work.
