<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
Answer: 3. Ideological divisions
Explanation:
In the late nineteenth century, people were basically divided among the two strongest contending parties which are the Democratic and Republican parties.
The masses were strongly involved in the political affairs leading to large voters turnout. Some political analysts attribute the passion with which people supported their political affiliations to cultural inclinations.
Answer:
In the early morning of 14 October 1066, two great armies prepared to fight for the throne of England.
Explanation:
On a hilltop 7 miles from Hastings were the forces of Harold, who had been crowned king nine months earlier.
In ancient Rome, the wealthy noble citizens were known as the Patricians, while the lower class citizens were call the plebians. The plebians had far less social impact than the Patricians.
Answer:
Gave the world first democracy, they took the first scientific approach to develop medicine, they also helped develope geometry and other math
