1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
7

Do you think there should be more than two parties in the US political system, or does the US system work well? Write one paragr

aph in response to this question. Use your own words, and support your argument with information from the article.
History
2 answers:
Maksim231197 [3]3 years ago
8 0

The dominance of two major parties in the US system tends to obscure representativeness of all US citizens. The bipartisan United States model does not work well.  In a country with large geographical differences, where groups of various ethnic groups live, it would be logical to assume that a party system with only two parties would not reasonably reflect the aspirations and concerns of the many subcultures that flourish there. Therefore, it would be logical to expect that there would be a multiparty system in the country. But this is clearly a case in which expectations do not match reality.

Ghella [55]3 years ago
7 0
There is no right or wrong answer to this question. This is very opinion based hence the "do you THINK.." What do you think? Do you think there should be more than 2 parties in the US political system (democratic and Republican), or do you think the way things are set up are fine? 
And why do you feel this way. If I were you, I'd research the democratic and republican party. Other than that, I can't give you a right or wrong answer or do your work for you. All I can do is tell you my opinion. Which I think it works fine. I personally feel more than one political party would complicate politics furthermore. 

You might be interested in
I need help ASAP PLEASE!!
nydimaria [60]

In the Europe of 1800's, the beliefs displayed in this question could be labeled as follows:

Conservative: The government should be led by a monarch with legitimacy from God; the government should mantain stability through a social class system. The explanation is that, those who call themselfs conservatives do so because they are in favor to keep things the way they are, manteining the status quo; the type of government that ruled Europe in 1800 was the monarchy, and they believed that stability could be reached by a social class system, the royal family and the plebeians.

Liberal: People should be able to work their way up the social ladder; the government should emphasize citizens' rights as listed in a constitution. Liberals, in general, believe and praise freedom for all people, and often the government's intervention in society is questioned; some say that the government's role should be smaller, intervening only in crucial questions, like the assurance of rights, while others believe that the government should have a central power figure.

6 0
3 years ago
Which event in US history was a major contributing factor to US imperialism?
MArishka [77]
Three factors fueled American Imperialism.
Economic competition among industrial nations. Political and military competition, including the creation of a strong naval force. A belief in the racial and cultural superiority of people of Anglo-Saxon descent.
8 0
2 years ago
How did the british protect their supremancy with the help of military system?
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

The British seemed unbeatable. During the previous 100 years, the British had enjoyed triumph after triumph over nations as powerful as France and Spain. At first glance, the odds were clearly against the Americans. A closer look provides insight into how the underdogs emerged victorious. Britain's military was the best in the world. Their soldiers were well equipped, well disciplined, well paid, and well fed. The British navy dominated the seas. Funds were much more easily raised by the Empire than by the Continental Congress. Some of those funds were used to hire Hessian mercenaries to fight the Americans. The Americans had tremendous difficulty raising enough funds to purchase basic supplies for their troops, including shoes and blankets. The British had a winning tradition. Around one in five Americans openly favored the Crown, with about half of the population hoping to avoid the conflict altogether. Most Indian tribes sided with Britain, who promised protection of tribal lands.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What brought French explorer René-Robert Cavalier, Sieur de La Salle to the coast of<br> Texas?
storchak [24]

Answer:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5 0
2 years ago
Morrina1 IS MY FRIEND IN REAL LIFE BEEEEEEE FREEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
devlian [24]

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did the Sons of Liberty do?
    15·1 answer
  • What ocean borders Africa to the east?
    10·1 answer
  • What do you think "where there's a will there's a way" means
    15·1 answer
  • Help please-
    12·1 answer
  • (MC)Passage of which of these represented a shift from the foreign policy that dominated American politics between the two world
    12·1 answer
  • When was the last time the cubs were in the world series?
    13·1 answer
  • How does the Constitution establish shared power among the three branches of government?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was it a big deal for Mansa Musa to grant military heroes this special treatment?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Spanish choose a site on the San Antonio river for a new settlement?
    10·1 answer
  • Which industry, influenced by the steam engine, first allowed for technological innovations in transportation?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!