1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zalisa [80]
3 years ago
5

Tina is a human resource executive at Savvy Savers, a financial planning firm. The executives want to introduce electronic monit

oring of the office staff. Tina needs to prepare for the concerns she expects employees to have and to show them that the performance data gathered will be used ethically. Which use of electronic monitoring would most likely demonstrate this to employees?
A.using performance data to rank employees and terminate the underperformersB.using performance data to coach employees so they develop their skillsC.using performance data to measure time spent at desks, not quality of workD.posting performance data on the companyâs website for clientsâ referenceE.ensuring that employees donât know that the purpose of the system is to increase productivity
Business
1 answer:
Luba_88 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. using performance data to rank employees and terminate the underperformers.

Explanation:

Tina would most likely use that scenario to demonstrate to the workers about the ethics of electronic monitoring because it will demonstrate the transparency of the company because it is open about what it plans to do with the data obtained from the electronic monitoring.

If Tina, the human resource executive of Savvy Savers, a financial planning firm can explain that the electronic monitoring is aimed at picking the most reliable workers and terminating underperformers, it will solve the issue of ethics because there is transparency for all parties involved.

You might be interested in
Two companies share a market, in which they currently make $5,000,000 each. Both need to determine whether they should advertise
snow_tiger [21]

Answer: Please refer to Explanation.

Explanation:

Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.

If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.

If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,

= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million

= $6 million.

A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.

If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.

With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.

However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.

3 0
3 years ago
Jack and Scotty begin negotiations where Scotty will give Jack hockey lessons for a certain amount of money per week. While they
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

The best option is a.

The court will award Scotty a reasonable amount for the lessons he already taught.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
If you put $100 into a bank account that earns five percent interest per year, what is the formula you should use to determine t
Ainat [17]

Answer:

Future value equals the present value multiplied by one plus the rate of interest in decimals.

Explanation:

Future value = present value x (1 + interest rate)

Interest rate = present value x interest rate

3 0
3 years ago
Brian recently had to have minor surgery that cost him $3,000. He used the $2,300 remaining in his HSA but will pay the rest out
Gala2k [10]

Answer: Brian will have $700 dollars to pay the medical bill balance

Explanation: You already know your total is $3,000. Subtract 3,000 - 2,300, which will give you $700.00

4 0
2 years ago
the total estimated cost of attending a public year to year college is 2265. The cost of attending a college is expected to incr
Anna11 [10]
5% of 2265$ is 113,25$
Because 5% is 5/100 so 5 x 2265$ = 11325$
11325$ : 100 = 113,25$
Second year cost is the first year’s plus 5% so
2265$ + 113,25$ = 2378,25$ (second year cost)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ​ An advantage of a firm pursuing multiple segment specialization is that:
    8·2 answers
  • What is the highest degree a person must reach to be in management
    11·2 answers
  • HURRY HURRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Creating policies for health and safety is part of which risk management strategy? A.) Avoiding risk B.) Sharing risk C.) Accept
    11·1 answer
  • Lilly's team had trouble keeping up with all the changes being made to the
    15·2 answers
  • Before going into a prospect's office, the secretary advised the new salesperson that her boss likes facts and figures and is su
    9·2 answers
  • The histogram below represents the number of television sets per household for a sample of u.s. households. what is the minimum
    13·1 answer
  • In X1, Adam and Jason formed ABC, LLC, a car dealership in Kansas City. In X2, Adam and Jason realized they needed an advertisin
    5·1 answer
  • Germany is capital abundant country and Japan is labor abundant country. If computers are produced mostly by capital and beer is
    12·1 answer
  • The goal of global market segmentation is to break down a new foreign market for a product or a service into different groups of
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!