Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
Answer:
Definition: A cruel (violent) action done, unprovoked.
Melancholy would mean sadness, so the answer is B
Answer: Civic engagement is seen by many as an activity that serves not only as a key component
to the maintenance of a democracy, but also as a force that sustains social ties across
communities small and large (Colby et al., 2000; Putnam, 1993; 2000). As defined by Thomas
Ehrlich, civic engagement can be understood as “…working to make a difference in the civic life
of our communities and developing the combination of knowledge, skills, values and motivation
to make that difference…[and] promoting the quality of life in a community, through both
