Answer:
at the airport we went on a sightseeing tour maybe?
Answer: B. they're friends yet they have nothing in common.
Explanation:
In The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide, Enfield and Utterson are friends who are very fond of each other.
The answer C. would be incorrect because the two of them are very good friends and do not argue all the time, as well as the answer D., as they are obviously not enemies.
The only answer that is correct is: B. they're friends yet they have nothing in common. The two of them are distant relatives, and although they spend every Sunday going for a walk together, they do not really talk during those walks, as they do not have much in common. Since neither of them likes to gossip, they usually walk in silence.
Answer:
it would be id i believe since it has nothing to do with his ego. so it would eliminate both ego and superego.
Answer:
I believe it is: Li's speech is more effective because it uses visuals of maps and timelines.
Explanation:
Li gave evidence of freedom. While Jackie just repeated phrases over and over again. Jackie's Speech could've sounded like this:
"Freedom is good. Freedom gives people opportunities. Freedom is good because it gives people opportunities. Freedom makes people happy. Freedom is good to make people happy."
Do you see how boring that is? Jackie is just repeating over and over again that "freedom is good."
On the other hand, Li could have something like this: (Please note I just made up the dates to state my point)
"Back in 1745, slaves were kept as.. well slaves. It was not right. So Abraham Lincoln decided to free them. (Here Li would show a graph of how happy the African Americans became after they were free.) Do you see how the happy bar increased?"
Li's speech is waaay more interesting. I hope I have helped! :)
The danger is failing or doing poorly since indolently means lazy.
