The economic uncertainty in the U.S. market and the customers' preferences.
Answer:
The answer is given below
Explanation:
Compounding frequency is the number of times the interest is paid in a year. A higher compounding frequency for a investment with the same initial investment and time horizon would produce more interest and profit as compared to that with a lower compounding frequency. But for a smaller initial investment or less time horizon of higher compounding frequency as compared to larger initial investment or more time horizon of lower compounding frequency, that of the lower compounding frequency is more desirable because it would produce more interest.
Answer:
I sold a used laptop for $139, even though I was willing to go as low as $130 in order to sell it - producer surplus PRODUCER SURPLUS
Even though I was willing to pay up to $147 for a watch and even though the seller was willing to go as low as $137 in order to sell it, we couldn't reach a deal because the government imposed a tax of $16 on the sale of watches. - neither NEITHER
Even though I was willing to pay up to $47 for a jersey sweater, I bought a jersey sweater for only $39. - CONSUMER SURPLUS
Explanation:
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell the product.
In this question, the producer surplus is $139 - $130 = $9
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the product.
In this question, the consumer surplus is $47 - $39 = $8
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
satisficing
Explanation:
Satisficing is a combination of "satisfy" and "suffice" (or enough). It refers to a situation where instead of trying to reach a completely satisfying solution, you just settle for a relatively good or a so-so solution.
Personally I believe it is something that borders mediocrity, since you should either do something right or do not do it at all. It is like doing something that might work, but not completely.
Answer:
B. The lessor does not have the right to stop delivery in transit due to the lessee's breach of the lease agreement; instead, the lessor must deliver the goods to the lessee in spite of the breach, and then sue the lessee for damages.
Explanation:
During the transit of goods, if the lessor learns of a breach of the lease agreement, he has every right to stop the delivery of the goods in transit by notifying the goods carrier or bailee. Since the carrier of the goods reports directly to the lessor, once he receives instructions from the lessor to stop delivery of goods, and he still has sufficient time, the delivery should be stopped.
Once the goods are reclaimed, the lessor can then decide to sue to recover damages. He can also, decide to cancel the contract at that point
