<span>This would be the antagonist. These molecules oppose the actions of the agonists. Antagonists are typically responsible for returning a muscle to the position it was in before the movement took place. These molecules are typically on opposite sides of a joint so as to be counteracting forces.</span>
Answer:
56071
Explanation:I have 200 IQ NO CAP!!!!
<span>This is a toughie.
Where the two would disagree: Clay was a whig, a sort of father figure to whigs and even Republicans like A. Lincoln. (Once the Repub party was formed, abt 1856, it included many Whigs) Generally whigs believed in expansion of fed power to include projects such as canals and road building; in other words, infrastructure. Democrats like Jackson were opposed to Fed power. jackson didn't even believe the Fed gov had a right to build state roads. And he was adamantly opposed to the Fed Bank.
However, both were pro Union and worked to defeat state rights and even secession when it threatened. Jackson opposed South Carolina and its efforts at nullification. And Clay was known as the Great Compromiser, instrumental in keeping the South from seceeding. The Compromise of 1850 was one of his main triumphs: this at least put off the Civil War for a decade. So both AJ and HC were Southerners who were pro union.
Thus you'd want to made their dialog include where they agreed and disagreed.</span>
"Eighty-year-old, Mary, was struggling to put her groceries in the trunk of her car. Sixteen-year-old," Joshua is demonstrating altruism. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
altruism?</h3>
Generally, altruism is simply defined as Care for the well-being of others without any expectation of personal gain.
In conclusion, altruism is characterized by or characterized by a selfless focus on the well-being of others
Read more about altruism
brainly.com/question/15075979
#SPJ1
Federalists, led by Hamilton and Adams, wanted a powerful national government to push for aggressive economic development.
Republicans, led by Jefferson and Madison, wanted a small national government to leave the citizens mostly free of taxation or government interference.
I would have favored Federalists who wanted a powerful national government to push for aggressive economic development because if we look at China,they have a strong national government and have pushed for strong economic development.China has progressed very fast in the last 30 years or so. 100 million people have jumped from lower class to middle class and have started paying higher taxes.China has grown faster than any other country in the world and they have lot of surplus funds as they export their stuff to almost all the countries in the world.
