When there is oncoming traffic on a two lane highway at night, you should always use your low beam headlights. High beams can be used when there is not any traffic coming towards you. When there is approaching traffic coming towards you, make sure to turn the high beams off.
I'll just post the text where the statement "note an irony in my argument" is found.
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
Paris is the first person to arrive at the tomb and it was to pay his respects to Juliet (place flowers and grieve).
Answer:
1). Children <u>are grown</u> up much too quickly today.
2). Girls of twelve <u>are dressed</u> as if they are eighteen.'
Explanation:
Active voice is demonstrated as the grammatical construction in which the subject itself performs the action while in the passive voice the object and the verb act upon the subject and the subject become the recipient of the action. In the former, the subject is emphasized while in the latter the object is focused upon and showed interest in. In the given sentences, the doers of the actions are missing, and therefore, they will be filled using the rule of passive voice for present indefinite tense 'is/am/are + V3' as mentioned above.
Answer: there is an error in sentence 1.
