1. "Atticus had used every tool available to free men to save Tom Robinson, but in the secret courts of men's hearts Atticus had no case. Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened her mouth and screamed." - Chapter 25
Scout figures out that sometimes bigotry and emotion overpower a supposedly objective justice system.
2. "Atticus was right. One time he said you never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them. Just standing on the Radley porch was enough." - Chapter 31
Because of her age and limited knowledge, Scout takes her father's comment literally, musing that she can see the post office on the corner from the Radley porch. But the figural meaning is clear to readers.
3. "I said I would like it very much, which was a lie, but one must lie under certain circumstances and at all times when one can't do anything about them." - Chapter 13
Scout realizes it does no good to point out hurtful truths that cannot be changed.
Sample thesis statements: In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee characterizes Atticus as a man who stands for justice above all else. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch represents courage in almost every aspect of his life.
Answer: The rhyme scheme of the poem is, ABAB, CDCD, EFEF.
Explanation:
Rhyme schemes are the patterns of a line that are designed in such a way that they rhyme with each other. For example, the words game and same are rhyming words. In ‘Sonnet 5’ William Shakespeare have used ABAB, CDCD, EFEF rhyme scheme.
The first line of the poem ends with ‘frame’ (A). The second line end with the word ‘dwell’ (B). The third line end with ‘same’ (A), while the fourth line ends with ‘excel’ (B). Thus making it ABAB rhyme.
Similarly, the other lines (on-gone, there-where) make the CDCD rhyme scheme and so on.
One answer would be Bill Gates because his 1st business failed.
Answer:
It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
Explanation:
Based on the given lines, it can be inferred that Allen shared his opinion and he believes that the specific case could be analyzed in a manner that is similar to those used for other similar cases. This is based on the line in the text as quoted above. The suggestions from everyone on the specific issue can be tabled and considered.
The answer is C hope this helps