Congress holds the power to declare war. As a result, the President cannot declare war without their approval.
However, as the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, Presidents have sent troops to battle without an official war declaration (which happened in Vietnam and Korea).
The philosophical term “a priory” was popularized by
Immanuel Kant and it concerns epistemology, philosophy dealing with the theory
of knowledge. A priory actually refers to something that can be deduced by
reason alone, while the "a posteriori" is something that cannot be known by reason
alone like empirical facts.
Answer:
- Executive Director
- Program Director
- Development Directors
- Grant Writers
Explanation:
Person responsible for overseeing the whole administration, programs and plans of the organization. They are also in charge or key planning, fundraising and interacting with the community.
Responsible for developing and maintaining the degree-granting program(s). Also responsible for the overall success of the program.
Responsible for making sure people (the public) know what the programs goal is and try to rope them in. They make sure people know what the mission is.
Their goal is to make sure the written word is out and request funding from other services or businesses.
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
