The answer is corrosive health hazard.
The ecological footprint is a general assessement of the population while the ecological footprint per capita means the ratio a country's per capita Footprint to the per capita biological capacity available on Earth.
<h3>What is an Ecological Footprint?</h3>
This is best defined as the impact of human activities which is measured in terms of the area of biologically productive land and water required to produce the goods consumed and to assimilate the wastes generated.
The importance of Ecological Footprint is due to the fact that it does measures the biologically productive area that are needed to provide for everything that people demand from nature such as fruits, vegetables, meat, fish, wood, cotton, fibres, as well as absorption of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and space for buildings and road.
In essence, the ecological Footprint assess how fast or quick the people consume resources and generate waste compared to how fast nature can absorb our waste and generate resources.
Read more about Ecological Footprint
brainly.com/question/14441911
#SPJ1
Wait what you said destructive relationship twice I don’t understand ???
I believe the answer you're looking for is "Specificity".
<em>(Please mark this answer as Brainliest and leave a Thanks if I helped you!)</em>
Answer:
I wish I could help but I sure I saw a question like this on khan academy. you can try there
