The term that is defined as the maximum legal price for a good or service is the price ceiling.
Explanation:
A price ceiling happens once the government puts a legal limit on how high the worth of a product may be. so as for a price ceiling to be effective, it should be set below the natural market equilibrium. When a price ceiling is about, a shortage happens. For the worth that the ceiling is about at, there's a lot of demand than at the equilibrium worth. there's additionally less offer than at the stability worth, therefore there's a lot of amounts demanded than the amount provided. Associate degree inability happens, since at the worth ceiling amount equipped the marginal profit exceeds the distinctive cost. This inefficiency is adequate to the deadweight welfare loss.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
I believe that we as american citizens have the right to whom we belve in and how we do.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given textual and archaeological evidence, it is thought that thousands of Europeans lived in Imperial China during the period of Mongol rule.[1] These were people from countries traditionally belonging to the lands of Christendom during the High to Late Middle Ages who visited, traded, performed Christian missionary work, or lived in China. This occurred primarily during the second half of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th century, coinciding with the rule of the Mongol Empire, which ruled over a large part of Eurasia and connected Europe with their Chinese dominion of the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368).[2] Whereas the Byzantine Empire centered in Greece and Anatolia maintained rare incidences of correspondence with the Tang, Song and Ming dynasties of China, the Roman papacy sent several missionaries and embassies to the early Mongol Empire as well as to Khanbaliq (modern Beijing), the capital of the Mongol-led Yuan Dynasty. These contacts with the West were preceded by rare interactions between the Han-period Chinese and Hellenistic Greeks and Romans.
The U.S. reluctance to send Americans to fight in foreign countries for fear of getting the U.S. involved in another Vietnam is called "D<span>. the Vietnam syndrome," since the Vietnam War was viewed by many as being a foreign policy disaster. </span>
Both speeches focus on the history of fighting for a cause leading up to the Civil War. The US was built on revolutionary spirit and men's lives lost for the bigger idea of freedom. The deaths of the men will mean something because the cause of the war means something.
These addresses revitalized the Union effort and reminded the men of the long history they were now a part of. They stand on the side of freedom and that will be meaningful. This dedicate brought up morale in Union forces.
