The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company? 
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range. 
Do you agree with the decision? 
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract. 
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year. 
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
 Answer and Explanation:
amount borrowed = $10,000
interest rate =12%
interest accrued = $10,000*12%*1/12
                             = $100
date             general journal                          debit                    credit
jan 31            interest expense                       100                       
                         interest payable                                                    100
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
a) the correct answer is "B"
b) the correct answer is "C"
Explanation:
a) the correct answer is "B"
relies on nominal GDP which might have increased because of price increases and not output increases. As nominal GDP accounts for the price and it is calculated at the current price level. The answer is "B".
b) the correct answer is "C"
We can ask for growth rate of real GDP which excludes price change.
  
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
- Gain = $271,310
- Net reduction in retained earnings = $105,690
Explanation:
Gain = (Ivanhoe market price - Purchase price) * Number of shares issued as property dividend
Purchase price = 130,000 / 16,000
= $8.13
Number of shares issued as property dividend = 130,000 shares of Concord / 10
= 13,000 Ivanhoe shares 
Gain = (29 - 8.13) * 13,000
= $271,310
Net reduction in retained earnings:
= Dividends payable - Gain
= (13,000 * 29) - 271,310
= $105,690
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
sorry I don't have one! T~T
Explanation: