Since Margo purchase her optimal consumption bundle, the
marginal utility per dollar consumed on dance lessons must be equivalent to the
marginal utility per dollar paid on dance shoes. The marginal utility per
dollar spent on dance lessons is 100 utils per lesson, where $50 per lesson is equivalent
to 2 utils per dollar. The marginal utility per dollar expended on dance shoes
therefore has to equal 2 utils per dollar. Since the marginal utility of a pair
of dance shoes cost 300 utils per pair, the value of a pair of shoes should be
$150 per pair, so that 300 utils per pair/$150 per pair is equal to: 2 utils
per dollar.
Answer:
a differentiation advantage
Explanation:
This scenario best illustrates a differentiation advantage. This is basically when a company is able to offer a product that, despite being the same as the competitor's product, is slightly different or offers something that the competitors do not. This small difference is what attracts the customers and increases profits. In this case, Fashion Mart Corp is differentiating their product by providing a guarantee of quality, which the competitors offering similar products cannot offer.
<span>An economic system is a system of production, resource allocation, and distribution of goods and services within a society or a given geographic area.</span>
Answer:
The incidence of a tax is determined by which group (buyers or sellers) must actually pay the government. FALSE, the real effect of taxes is measured by the price elasticity of the demand and the supply.
When demand is inelastic and supply is elastic, the burden of a tax falls mainly on producers. FALSE, when the price elasticity of demand is inelastic and the price elasticity of supply is elastic, the burden of tax falls mainly on the consumers.
When demand is elastic and supply is inelastic, the burden of a tax falls mainly on consumers. FALSE, when the price elasticity of demand is elastic and the price elasticity of supply is inelastic, the burden of tax falls mainly on the suppliers.
An excise tax can distort incentives and create missed opportunities for mutually beneficial transactions. TRUE
Answer:
$ 1,781.53
Explanation:
The future value of the 5-year CD can be determined by using the future value formula stated below:
FV=PV*(1+r)^n
FV is the future value which is expected future amount after 5 years
PV is the initial amount used in purchasing the CD i.e $1500
r is the rate of return on the CD on an annual basis which is 3.5%
n is the number of years the investment would last which is 5 years
FV=$1500*(1+3.5%)^5
FV=$1500*1.187686306
FV=$ 1,781.53
