1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
12

What was the historical reason for the separation of powers?

History
2 answers:
kifflom [539]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The separation of powers is a political principle in some forms of government, in which the legislative, executive and judicial powers of the State are exercised by different government bodies, independent of each other. This is the fundamental quality that characterizes democracy.

Montesquieu argued that "every man who has power is inclined to abuse it; He goes until he finds limits. In order that power can not be abused, it is necessary for the disposition of things to detain power". In this way, the vigilance of the three powers among themselves is entrusted, since each one of them supervises, controls and stops the excesses of the others to prevent, by own ambition, that one of them predominates over the others. It can be contrasted with the merger of powers and separation of functions in parliamentary systems, where the executive and the legislature are unified, because the legislature appoints the executive.  

This doctrine does not refer only to the separation and balance of the three classic powers of the Government, but to the need to divide the political power where it is located, be it in the municipal, regional or national sphere, in order to guarantee political freedom and avoid abuses of power, through the surveillance and reciprocal control of separate powers.

chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago
6 0
The historical reasoning for separation of power because congress believed no one branch should have too much power and thus separating equal power into all three branches 
You might be interested in
The law that governs international business and forbids payments by American firms to foreign officials to influence decisions i
Elina [12.6K]
The law that governs international business and forbids payments by American firms to foreign officials to influence decisions is "<span>C. the North American Free Trade Agreement" since this was implemented to deal with the effects of globalization. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Thousands of English Puritans arrived in Massachusetts Bay during the Great Migration. Why were they coming to the colony?
Misha Larkins [42]
The correct answer is
<span>D. They fled from religious persecution in England.

They were puritans so everyone in Europe disliked them. Puritans were something like extremist protestant Christians with extreme work ethics and ideas of Christian purity. This wasn't approved by the regular Catholics or by the common protestants.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me please with this question please Does anyone know this How did the French Revolution affect the French colon
Arisa [49]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. The French Revolution affected the French colony of Saint-Domingue, today's Haiti, inspired the Haitian people to mount their own rebellion for independence.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How did the North achieve victory in the Civil War? a) through attrition and massive advances on several fronts b) by fighting m
N76 [4]

Answer:

a) through attrition and massive advances on several fronts

Explanation:

American Civil War or simply Civil War in the United States was a war (although Congress never issued a Declaration of War) waged in the United States from 1861 to 1865. As a result, among other things, a historical controversy over slavery and against of the attempts of the American federal executive to take powers that did not correspond to him in a constitutional manner, the war broke out in April 1861, when the forces of the Confederate States of America attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, shortly after President Abraham Lincoln assumed his position. The nationalists of the Union proclaimed loyalty to the Constitution of the United States. They clashed with secessionists from the Confederate States, who defended the rights of states to expand slavery.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement would an Anti-Federalist be most likely to agree with?
Verizon [17]
Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government. Therefor, they most likely agree that the Constitution needs to be changed to include a bill of rights.





Here’s ur answer





Mark me as brainliest
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How long did it take to cross the Atlantic Ocean by the 1800s
    11·1 answer
  • What best defines "War Hawks?"
    8·2 answers
  • Victories in which of the following battles prompted foreign nations to support the Continental army?
    6·2 answers
  • Around the twelfth century, simple grave markers began to appear as did elaborate effigies. this was as part of increasing empha
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following did tye civil rights act accomplish
    12·1 answer
  • Tired of those advertisers on brainly directing you towards buying premium?
    15·1 answer
  • Please only if you know!
    13·2 answers
  • What are the three unalienable rights [lines 13 and 14] listed in the preamble of the Declaration of Independence?
    13·1 answer
  • Guys help me with this and explain it
    15·1 answer
  • The
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!