Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Answer:
A silent partner
Explanation:
A silent partner is a partner whose liability is limited to the amount invested in the project. Also, a limited partner hardly takes part in the day to day running of the business.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Explanation:
a. "not in the labor force" since she is neither working or looking for a job and instead is studying
b. "employed", currently works as a tennis coach
c. "unemployed", she does not have a paying job yet but is looking for one
d. "not in the labor force", does not have a job and is not looking for one at the current moment in his life.
Answer:
$600
Explanation:
If instead of itemizing, Mary had elected the standard deduction last year, then she wouldn't have to include any state income tax refund on her current gross income. But since she itemized her deductions and actually deducted these $600 from her gross income last year, she must include them in he current gross income.
Answer:
None of the options are correct
Explanation:
The train would cost her, which is computed as:
= Cost + (Hours × Opportunity Cost)
= $400 + (4 hours × $15 per hour)
= $400 + $60
= $460
The driving would cost her, which is computed as:
= Cost + (Hours × Opportunity Cost)
= $250 + (6 hours × $15 per hour)
= $250 + $90
= $340
Savings = Train Cost - Driving Cost
= $460 - $340
=$120
None of the options are correct as the she would save $120.