Answer:
a. 9.43%
Explanation:
IRR is the rate of return that makes initial investment equal to present value of cash inflows
Initial investment = Annuity*[1 - 1 /(1 + r)^n] /r
1250 = 325 * [1 - 1 / (1 + r)^5] /r
Using trial and error method, i.e., after trying various values for R, lets try R as 9.43%
1250 = 325 * [1 - 1 / (1 + 0.0943)5] /0.0943
1250 = 325 * 3.846639
1250 = 1,250
Therefore, The project IRR is 9.43%
Answer: confidentiality agreement (CA)
Answer:
Equity at August 1st 0
adds: Carmen Camry Investment 101,4000
Net Income 5,410
Subtotal 106,810
Withdrawals -5,950
Carmen Camry capital account at the end of August 31th 100,860
Explanation:
We have to calculae the net income
Fees earned 26,960
office 5,200
rent expense 9,500
salaries expense 5,560
telephone expense 820
miscellaneous expenses 470
Total Expenses 21,550
Net Income 5,410
Then we do the equity stamtent:
beginning + investment + net income - withdrawals = ending
Equity at August 1st 0
adds: Carmen Camry Investment 101,4000
Net Income 5,410
Subtotal 106,810
Withdrawals -5,950
Carmen Camry capital account at the end of August 31th 100,860
Answer:
$2000
Explanation:
According to CDC research, each employee who smokes costs his or her organization approximately $2000 per year due to reasons such as;
• Smoke breaks at work which accumulate to reduce the amount of time spent doing productive work.
• Health related issues resulting from smoking that may cost the organization money or cause the employee to be absent from work (research shows that smokers are absent from work more than non smokers.
Therefore, for each smoker who quits smoking, Hanson Manufacturing will gain approximately $2000 in productivity.
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
