Answer:
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.
Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.
As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.
Answer:
PV= $1,311.17
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future Value (FV)= $5,000
Number of periods (n)= 25 years
Interest rate (i)= 5.5% compounded annually
T<u>o calculate the present value (PV), we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
PV= FV / (1+i)^n
PV= 5,000 / 1.055^25
PV= $1,311.17
The answer to this question is "Market Orientation" such as when the homeowner <span>visited the home depot to buy what he thought he needed to fix a leaking toilet, he gathered up materials totaling almost $70. When on his way to check out, an employee asked him what was he trying to fix. After some discussion, the employee convinced the homeowner that a $5.99 replacement part would fix the problem better than the materials he thought he needed and with less trouble. This kind of discussion between employees and customers is commonplace at the home depot and indicates the retail store has a MARKET orientation.</span>
The answer is <span>The start-up costs in a monopolistically competitive industry are low.</span>
<span>The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is the the change in consumption divided by change in income. Where change in in consumption = $50B and change in income = $200B. So we have 50/200 =1/4 = 0.25. So the MPC is $250M</span>