Answer:
d.) I and II
Explanation:
The first proposition can be regarded as proposition that gives a clam that capital structure of a company has no impact on the value. The value of a company is been known as present value of future cash flows when it's calculated, then it cannot be affected by capital structure. It should be noted that MM Proposition I with corporate taxes states that capital structure can affect firm value by an amount that is equal to the present value of the interest tax shield.
Answer:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Raking 2% interest rate:
1) 10 years
2) 5 years
3) 1 year
Raking 18% interest rate:
1) 1 year
2) 5 years
3) 10 years
Explanation:
You have to apply to bring the amount of money to present value, according with the information, the formula is the next:
Present Value = Future Value/((1+ interest rate)^(n))
Where n is the number of years that you have to wait to receive the money.
You have to calculate every situation with the respective amount of time and interest rate, the result must be money. and when you get the 9 results, you have to compare every situation and chose the higher amount of money according to the interest rate, for example:
Present value = 140/ ((1+10%)^(1))= 127
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 149
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 135
So the answer for the first scenario with an interest rate of 10% is:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Answer: The correct answer is " b. variables measured in terms of money but not variables measured in terms of quantities or relative price".
Explanation: According to classical macroeconomic theory, changes in the money supply affect variables measured in terms of money but not variables measured in terms of quantities or relative price.
Answer:
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
- The US federal government which had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Explanation:
When unexpected inflation occurs, the usual plan to by Monetary Institutions of a country is raising the interest rates.
By doing that, they want to stop it or slowly decelerate it.
So that it becomes more expensive to take a loan, the idea is to reduce consumption.
In Economics, it's a bad scenario after all. Few winners. Many losers.
So, let's examine them
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
At first, The 3rd National is going to be winning since the value of the debt will rise, depending on the type of contract and an increase in the interest rate will demand corrections on the monthly payments. But on the other hand, the number of default clients and overdue installments will raise for sure.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
Inflation reduces the real buying value of her checks. And her pension can't grow otherwise this will feed the inflation too.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
Since his money is not invested then He's not having any earning that might give him some compensation. So his money is even more devalued.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
Depending on the contract Joy might be sleepless. Either her monthly payments will become more expensive or She may experience difficulties because of the weekly growing prices.
- The US federal government had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Certainly, the president and his secretary will have to address the fact that due to inflation and the chosen medicine make the nation's debt up to the sky. They must renegotiate the payment deadlines.
