The answer to this question is the second choice
hope this helps:)
Answer:
<u><em>Yes, No, Yes, Yes, Yes!</em></u>
Step-by-step explanation:
First Question:
<u>That is correct </u>because if you have $0 in your bank account and you withdraw $30 you will have -$30!
(And you are in debt which everyone hates!)
Second Question:
<u>No</u>, because that would be 125 above ground. You would need to say -125 instead of adding.
Third Question:
<u>Yes!</u> Let's say in the football game you had 70 yards, subtracting the 15 yards which you supposedly had lost would result in 55 yards therefore proving the fact that you did not progress but did the exact opposite!
Fourth Question:
<u>Yes</u>, because you are gaining more on your stock. This results in you getting more of a share in a company or product.
Fifth Question:
To be honest, I don't know if this: "0 feet could represent the altitude of a city that is located at sea level." is a question but I will answer it nonetheless!
<u>Yes,</u> because before right where the sea "starts" is what is called point 0. Meaning that, you are located at sea level!
Answer:
The percentage = (1.06/15.9) x 100℅
= 6.67℅
Step-by-step explanation:
For the two pan to be balanced in other to measure an object's accurate weight, the fulcrum must be exactly in the mid point of the distance/separation between the two pans.
In the case in this question, the dishonest shopkeeper has shifted the fulcrum by 1.06cm.
The pan separation is 31.8cm
The fulcrum position must be 31.8/2 = 15.9cm, for it to be balanced.
The percentage by which the true weight marked up by the shopkeeper is:
(1.06/True fulcrum position) x 100℅
Answer:
You can use the ASA Postulate to prove the Angle-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem. A flow proof is shown below. If two angles and a nonincluded side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding nonincluded side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it helps! Correct me if I am wrong!
I'm sure about my answer!
If you dont mind can you please mark me as brainlest?
Its ok if you don't want to!
Answer:
Option C is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The third one is right because the null hypothesis implies with all therapies, identical percent of kids suffer, and that simply means that there really is no distinction in drug therapies.
So, it defines the probabilities among both treated groups unless there was really no variation among drug therapies.
Due to the following reasons it describes that the following option is correct according to the statement.
