Answer:
Explanation:
His publication, "Spirit of the Laws," is considered one of the great works in the history of political theory and jurisprudence and under his model, the political authority of the state is divided into legislative, executive and judicial powers.
<h2>have a nice day!</h2>
Yes, there were huge plagues in Ancient Rome that caused all kind of devastation.....
One of the FIRST of the BIG plagues was the Antonine Plague, 165-180 AD, also known as the Plague of Galen, an ancient pandemic, whether of smallpox or measles, they are not sure, claimed the lives of TWO Roman emperors.
The disease broke out again 9 years later and caused up to 2,000 deaths a DAY at Rome, one quarter of those infected.
Total deaths have been estimated at five million.
Disease killed as much as one-third of the population in some areas, and decimated the Roman army.
This thing traveled far too, up into Gaul, all over Roman Europe.
The Plague of Justinian may have been the first instance of bubonic plague and was one of the causes of the Fall of the Roman Empire.
Smaller but no less deadlier plagues played havoc throughout the Roman Empire over many years.
Diseases from unkept Roman plumbing with the ground water mixing in with rain water.
One example was that Serbian nationalists killed Franz Ferdinand, the Crown Prince of Austria, which eventually caused the First World war - involving all the nations around Serbia, most directly Austria and Russia.
Serbian nationalism was also an important factor in the wars in Yugoslavia, for example in the Bosnian War and in the massacres, including the one in Srebrenica. <span />
Attributes (characteristic features) can let you predict and understand other people's behaviour. For example if someone is never late, and once they're late, you can assume they have a good reason or that something might have happened: in any case, this is good to know: if they have a good reason, you won't angry at them and if you think that something might have happened, you can work to find out what it was and help
The answer is<u> "an unrepresentative sample".</u>
Biased Sample, otherwise called the Unrepresentative Sample is viewed as a weak analogy.
This fallacy (a misstep, and a legitimate error is a slip-up in thinking) is framed when a man reaches a determination of a populace in light of a measure that is one-sided or biased.
The sample is biased or Unrepresentative somehow because of not having been picked arbitrarily from the population.
