An extreme belief for supernatural beings
Answer:
Option A: Appeal to unqualified authority
Explanation:
Fallacies of Weak Induction
This is said to take place only occurs the premises used as provided to support for a conclusion, but it is not enough to believe the conclusion.
Types of Fallacies of Weak Induction
1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority, 2. Appeal to Ignorance
3. Hasty Generalization
4. False Cause
5. Slippery Slope
6. Weak Analogy
Appeal to Unqualified Authority
In this type of appeal, an arguer used a statement made by another person as a form of evidence for a conclusion, and usually, that person is not qualified to to make such a statement. It is also defined as when the arguer appeals to an inappropriate or unqualified authority or expert as the basis for accepting a conclusion, therefore the viewpoint of such an individual that is raised is said to be logically irrelevant. It is only when an appeal to a legitimate expert such as eye-witness in court case etc. then it is a type of inductive argument.
Answer:
C. If a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted.
Explanation:
It is given in the question that the research study which is to be conducted at a foreign site is to be exempted from the Federal regulations by the institutional policy.
The Federal law for research study at the United States states that when any research is done at a foreign place and if such studies are qualified for exemptions, then according to the federal law, it does not require any review or the research at the foreign site.
Thus the answer is
C. If a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted.
Answer:
- eat healthy
- get regular exercise
- prevent your self from getting cancer by avoiding smoking and drinking
- get on a diet and maintain your weight
- manage the timing for your lunch or dinner
Explanation:
