This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
Answer:
The answer is the dual-process theory.
Explanation:
This theory seeks to explain how thoughts can be processed in two different ways: one that is automatic or unconscious, and another that is controlled or conscious.
According to the theory, unconscious thoughs can be changed in the long term through reinforcement, and conscious thoughts can be changed in a shorter time through persuasion or education.
Answer:Cohort effect
Explanation:
Here Psychologist tries to find the impact on education by taking different cohort. Cohort refers to the people who more or less of the same age. It shows the variation in an area of study over a period of time For different cohort which has common experience. Here the Internet is the common factor for different students.
Answer:
Warm air rises at the equator and cold air sinks at the poles.
I think in the USA
I hope I helped
