They are easy to compare if they all have the same common denominator, then you can easily order them by the magnitude of the numerators...
85/10, -67/10, -56/10, 82/10 so now they are easy to compare...so
-6.7, -28/5, 8.2, 17/2
Answer:
Option (4)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given sequence is,

We can rewrite this sequence as,

There is a common ratio between the successive term and the previous term,
r = 
r = 
Therefore, it's a geometric sequence with infinite terms. In other words it's a geometric series.
Since sum of infinite geometric sequence is represented by the formula,
, when r < 1
where 'a' = first term of the sequence
r = common ratio
Since common ratio of the given infinite series is greater than 1 which makes the series divergent.
Therefore, sum of infinite terms of a series will be infinite Or the sum is not possible.
Option (4) will be the answer.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Since we're dividing the polynomial by
, we'll be using -1 to start the division.
Before setting the division up, let's list the coefficients of
from descending powers and the constant.
The coefficient of
is 3
Since we don't see an
, the coefficient will be 0.
The coefficient of
is 5.
Lastly, the constant, which is the term without the
is -1.
Refer to the attached picture before continuing.
After referring to the picture, we now have the coefficients for the quotient.
The coefficient of
is 3.
The coefficient of
is -3.
The constant is 8.
Lastly, since the last number is not zero, it's the remainder just like regular division. This can be tricky to remember, but -9 is not the actual remainder.
The remainder is actually
.
Now putting all the pieces together, we get:

Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
dont trust me i dont know the answer sry
Answer:
Wyatt wrote the correct expression
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we are to evaluate which of the students wrote an expression with the highest common factor being 8c
For Tanya; 32c + 16c; 16c( 2 + 1); This is wrong as the highest common factor is 16c
For Wyatt, we have 8c - 48cd; factorizing, we have 8c(1-6cd); This is correct
For Xavier we have 36c-24c; 8 is not a factor of 36, so it won’t work
For Yang 8c + 40; 8(c+ 5); what we are trying to look for is 8c and not 8 so this is wrong also