The correct answer is letter B
Ceteris Paribus, also known as Coeteris Paribusis, means <em>"all variables except those specified are constant".</em>
In this way, Ceteris Paribus becomes a very important concept, as some studies that contain a large number of variables can be simplified.
In other words, you keep some variables constant, while you change others to identify their impact on the whole.
Let's imagine that you are making a pineapple juice with orange, and to make this juice you need 4 ingredients, water, pineapple, orange and sugar.
In this sense, for you to improve the juice you will touch the pineapple and orange variables, leaving the water and sugar variables unchanged and, to reach the ideal flavor, you decrease the pineapple and increase the orange or vice versa. This is the logic of Ceteris Paribus.
Investigative reporting by journalists into the wrongdoing of public officials satisfies the <u>watchdog</u><u> </u>role in the media.
Media outlets are commonly criticized for prioritizing political horserace coverage, which concentrates on candidate performance (e.g., who is performing well or poorly in the polls), rather than the actual content of campaign topics.
If broadcast stations decide to sell airtime to any candidate in a political campaign, they must do so on an equal basis, per the equal time rule.
Traditional media coverage could frustrate candidates because they have no influence over the substance.
To learn more about Media here
brainly.com/question/14047162
#SPJ4
Answer:
A case that could have affected the Supreme Court in a positive or in a negative way, and landmark cases are the most in important cases in the U.S Supreme court. For Example the first landmark case was Marbury v. Madison, It was the first time the Supreme court had ever used Judicial Review. Also in a most landmark cases it involves U.S citizens rights.
Explanation:
The Yazoo land fraud scandal was a scandal that occurred in 1794 where Georgia's governor and state legislature sold land in what is now Alabama and Mississippi to political insiders at a very low price. The fraud was found out and it highlighted the government's conflict of interest in selling land cheaply to political insiders which greatly angered the public to this illegitimate and illegal activity.
Answer:
c, recover damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different similar law suits regarding fraud, I can say that based on the information provided regarding the situation Drake needs to have proof of an injury in order to recover damages. If Drake does not have proof he will not be able to recover his initial investment from Eve.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
