Answer:
1. Tax avoidance
2.Tax avoidance
3.Tax evasion
Explanation:
Tax avoidance refers to a legal way of reducing one's tax liability through lawful deductions. Ways to reduce tax liabilities are; capitalizing on tax advantage retirement accounts, liasing with tax advisor on the legal way for tax avoidance. Tax avoidance is however legal.
Examples of tax avoidance are;
1. Andrea keeps a record of all her business related expenses.
2. Daniel claims the amount of interest paid for his mortgage as tax deductions.
Tax evasion is a deliberate attempt by a tax payer to avoid payment of tax liability. It is a fraudulent action by a tax payer to wilfully evade tax in an illegal manner. In tax evasion, income is concealed to tax authorities inorder to evade tax payment which is a criminal offence. It is to be noted that tax evasion is illegal in the eye of the law.
Example of tax evasion is ;
3. Christian did not report the tips he earned on his tax return.
If the standard deviation is 20.98%. The range you should expect to see with a 95 percent probability is: -31.02 percent to +52.9 percent.
<h3>Expected range of return </h3>
Expected range of return = 10.94 percent ± 2(20.98 percent)
Expected range of return =[10.94 percent- 2(20.98 percent)]; [10.94 percent + 2(20.98 percent)]
Expected range of return =(10.94 percent- 41.96 percent); (10.94 percent + 41.96 percent
Expected range of return = -31.02 percent to +52.9 percent
Inconclusion the range of returns is: -31.02 percent to +52.9 percent.
Learn more about expected range of return here:brainly.com/question/25821437
Answer: The correct answer is "a. lower wage rate and hire fewer workers than will a purely competitive employer.".
Explanation: Monopsony is generated when there are many people looking for work and there are only a few employers, who can afford to offer a lower salary than they would have to offer if there was more competition for workers.
Since Margo purchase her optimal consumption bundle, the
marginal utility per dollar consumed on dance lessons must be equivalent to the
marginal utility per dollar paid on dance shoes. The marginal utility per
dollar spent on dance lessons is 100 utils per lesson, where $50 per lesson is equivalent
to 2 utils per dollar. The marginal utility per dollar expended on dance shoes
therefore has to equal 2 utils per dollar. Since the marginal utility of a pair
of dance shoes cost 300 utils per pair, the value of a pair of shoes should be
$150 per pair, so that 300 utils per pair/$150 per pair is equal to: 2 utils
per dollar.
Making a line for ur chart i'm guessing