The economic principle of substitution says that when there are two houses in the same neighborhood with the same size, appeal, and utility, the lower-priced one will tend to sell first.
<h3>The economic principle of substitution</h3>
- According to the principle of substitution, the cost of purchasing a substitute that is just as desired tends to establish the upper limit of value, assuming no inopportune delays.
- A shrewd investor would not spend more on an asset that generates income than it would cost to construct or buy an asset of a similar nature.
- According to this theory, the cost of acquiring a comparable substitute property with the same use, design, and revenue determine the maximum value of a property in most cases.
- For instance, why would somebody pay $1,000,000 for a home when they could pay $750,000 for a different but as appealing home in the same neighborhood?
To learn more about the economic principle of substitution refer to:
brainly.com/question/9659517
#SPJ4
Answer: Advertise on radio and earn $14,000
Explanation: Dominant strategy may be explained as the tactics or option which works best for a particular firm and seems to give the firm an edge abive other competitors.
Since both are following their dominant strategy, even though advertising on TV seems more lucrative if only one of the advertise, by the time both of them place TV advert, profit falls to $8000. therefore the strategy who gives the highest return when both thread the same advertising path is the radio advert, which gives a return profit of $14,000. Therfore, Uan Pablo should advertise on radio and earn a profit of $14000
Answer:
Trend analysis is analysisof dollar changes and percentage changes over several years.
Explanation:
A trend analysis is a method of analysis that allows traders to predict what will happen with a stock in the future.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A is valid but i would be more worried about B when editing C and D say to fix something but it never says anything is wrong so the wording makes those answers wrong/very highly unlikely
