The answer is discouraged by government
Answer:
7.92%
Explanation:
The computation of the return on total assets is shown below:
Return on assets = (Net income) ÷ (average of total assets)
where,
Net income is $2,100
Average total assets = (Beginning total assets + ending total assets) ÷ 2
= ($33,500 + $19,500) ÷ 2
= $26,500
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $2,100 ÷ $26,500
= 7.92%
Answer:
$720.25
Explanation:
Given data:
Lana salary per hour = $18.15
total hour of work by her is 39 hr 41 minutes
we know from hundredth hour pay method
hundredth hr for 41 mints is 
so we have 39 hrs 41 minutes that can be written as = 39.6833
So, salary for 39.6833 is 
This may be true or false depending on the situation.
Explanation:
If countering in the inflation, banks were giving negative values all the time to their consumers they would not survive in the game.
But this is not to say this is not a practice that has been done to the unsuspecting people who have wanted to invest money.
They are being given policies and rates that after countering inflation are actually in loss for them as they do not grow as much as the money would have devalued by then.
This is however quite rare and is a malpractice.
Answer:
limited and their wants are unlimited.
Explanation:
In economics, resources are scarce and limited, but consumers' needs are unlimited. Unsatisfied needs or desires are theoretically unlimited, because as soon as you satisfy one need, you find out that you have another need that is unsatisfied. Some economic agents have more disposable resources than others, e.g. one country might have a large population and a lot of land, but their capital is short. The only resource that is scarce for everyone in the same manner is time.
